Nov
Nominate us for something
Seems like you can vote once per day! Hooray!

This is what I dressed up as. Did I look like a hot chick?
So the 2009 costume contest has come and gone and the winners were announced, but I didn’t talk about everyone who entered yet. And usually when there are individuals in our contests, I talk about them. Cause screw them. The gallery is at the bottom if you want to relive the glory of it. I am going to reference people in the order in which they finished in the contest. The no sign booby prize people are at the bottom. Boobies. Hee.
The rest (and the new pics) after the jump – don’t miss it!!!
I don’t have the time or frankly the desire to go through the whole tally of the Halloween contest tonight. I will update the Contest page with the winners etc. tomorrow night, and you can see all the special awards I will make up between now and then. I also got a couple late entries I will post.
For the time being, here is the winner in each bracket. You can be all snuggly knowing that your $100 and other no sign having booby prize will be along soon.
Regular Contest Winner: Super Ghost Boy
No Sign Winner: Zorro and Catherine Zeta Jones.
So…hooray.
You want to win $100.00? Well, all you need to do is win the costume contest. You were gonna dress up anyway, weren’t you?
Click here for the details and get going!
Well – looks like your ability to win by default is now out the window, we have ourselves a competition.
Remember that the poll will only be put up after all the pics are received (the deadline is Sunday) so don’t dick around. Also – in memory of Poor Ass Rip, if you do not have a printer or are too cheap to use your color ink, you can write a sign that says superficial gallery 2009 costume contest and use that. If you don’t have any paper or pen, you probably are also too poor to have a computer, so eat me.
UPDATE – CONTEST RECAP POST GOING UP THIS WEEK.

It’s the end of the summer and the Gallery staff is busy doing things other than writing posts. Because we are more of a hippie commune than a business, I fully support and respect their sabbaticals. Also, since I don’t pay them, there isn’t anything I can do about it. I don’t even pay myself. So before I get into the rest of my topic, make sure you contact me here or in the Bat Cave if you want to jump in and also do stuff for the personal fulfillment of maybe getting a comment from someone or the extra special prize of being sexually harassed by me (*drops pencil*).
But on a more serious topic, I want to know what is stealing regarding the Internet. I am not talking about posting up a column from Entertainment Weekly and saying I wrote it. Nor am I saying that I want to post the ENTIRE article from Entertainment Weekly and talk about it and link to it. But I am saying that I will take an excerpt from the article, then link the article then write some stupid joke about it. Is that stealing?
If that is stealing – then what the hell is the point of having in Internet? Is the guy who took the picture of the girl up above there that I messed with and put new words on looking to get paid cause I put it there? I mean, no way in Hell would I ever actually PAY him. But pretend for a minute that I wanted to. I got the pic from some other site. Who got it from some other site. And so on.
The reason I am even talking about this is that it is really a hell of a lot EASIER to ‘present’ content than create it when people are busy with their real lives, etc. Like, we get a million email forwards a day. If I wanted, we could have 50 posts a day from nothing but email forwards. Snopes be damned – I am gonna tell you that Tiger Woods wife posed nude. She didn’t, really, but the email I got said she did. And I didn’t post it. Cause I checked. I also didn’t post the thing about the heartwarming teacher who loves veterans so much. To see what I am talking about – Google for: “Back in September of 2005, on the first day of school, Martha Cothren, a social studies school teacher at Robinson High School in Little Rock”.
So – what is stealing and what isn’t? If we show you something you haven’t seen before, is it still entertaining even though all we did was show it to you? I am planning on ripping off a bunch of ‘aggregator’ sites this week. I am not even gonna link them. Rather, I am gonna present the content they took from somewhere else (making sure that I remove their watermark first). BUT! I am also going to NOT watermark it myself and pretend that I made it. I am not the fuck from ebaums world. Anyway – post your thoughts about Internet stealing etc. etc.

Tumbleweed. Stabweed. Both can be dangerous.
Well, things have been pretty slow this week. Seems like most of the gallery staff was busy making arrangements and complex legal deals concerning the death of Ted Kennedy. But now that the exploitation mourning is pretty much over, I am sure some of the staff will come back.
Maybe.
Or maybe they won’t. I don’t know. I remember I kept thinking my babysitter would come back that time she let me be a lookout for her while she ’scored some dope’. She never did, but the policeman that showed up much much later gave me a blanket and told me not to look behind me. But I digress. The point of all of this is that I am thinking you will probably have more crap to read soon, as now that my wisdom tooth is gone I have more room in my head for thinkings!
Or, if not thinking of things, at least finding mildly amusing things on YouTube and posting them for your consideration. What do you want from me? Also. If you see any of the staff, give them a blanket and tell them not to look behind them.
© 2009 Superficial Gallery | Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS)
Term and Condition
These celebrity pictures are assumed to be on the level, so if you are a celebrity and want us to take them down, contact us.
Or better yet, come by the office and explain why. We have cookies!