<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chocolate Calculator (it works)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.superficialgallery.com/chocolate-calculator-it-works/3859/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.superficialgallery.com/chocolate-calculator-it-works/3859</link>
	<description>Creepily Gathering Content Since 2005</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 08:31:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: vange</title>
		<link>http://www.superficialgallery.com/chocolate-calculator-it-works/3859#comment-2687</link>
		<dc:creator>vange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 03:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.superficialgallery.com/?p=3859#comment-2687</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s how it works:

Suppose you pick a number between 1 and 9 (more than 1 and less than 10).  To keep things general (and see why the &quot;trick&quot; works), I&#039;ll call this number x.  Following the numbered instructions, we get...

1. x
2. 2x
3. 2x + 5
4. 50(2x + 5) = 100x + 250
5. 100x + 250 +1759 = 100x + 2009   OR  100x + 250 + 1758 = 100x + 2008
(See why the &quot;trick&quot; works?  It forces you to 2008 or 2009, depending on your birthday.)
6. If you subtract the four-digit year of your birthday, what you get is...
100x + (2009 -  birth year)  OR  100x + (2008 - birth year)
...but the stuff in parentheses is just how you calculate your age (current year minus birth year).  The multiplication by 100 (really by 2 and then by 50) forces the single-digit number you chose into the third position (the &quot;hundreds place&quot;).

There are two caveats here.  First, it will only work (as written) if your age is a two-digit number.  So, if you&#039;re an old woman (100+) who likes chocolate, you&#039;re out of luck.  Second, the claim that this is the only year it will work is a little silly.  It will only work AS WRITTEN in 2009, but it&#039;s easy to see how we could change the rules so it works in future years.  You get some parameters (the numbers we multiplied by and added) to play with.  In 2010, use 1760/1759...in 2011, use 1761/1760...etc.  You could also manipulate the values to accommodate older folks, but the number of centenarians reading this sort of email is likely quite small.

You&#039;re all welcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s how it works:</p>
<p>Suppose you pick a number between 1 and 9 (more than 1 and less than 10).  To keep things general (and see why the &#8220;trick&#8221; works), I&#8217;ll call this number x.  Following the numbered instructions, we get&#8230;</p>
<p>1. x<br />
2. 2x<br />
3. 2x + 5<br />
4. 50(2x + 5) = 100x + 250<br />
5. 100x + 250 +1759 = 100x + 2009   OR  100x + 250 + 1758 = 100x + 2008<br />
(See why the &#8220;trick&#8221; works?  It forces you to 2008 or 2009, depending on your birthday.)<br />
6. If you subtract the four-digit year of your birthday, what you get is&#8230;<br />
100x + (2009 &#8211;  birth year)  OR  100x + (2008 &#8211; birth year)<br />
&#8230;but the stuff in parentheses is just how you calculate your age (current year minus birth year).  The multiplication by 100 (really by 2 and then by 50) forces the single-digit number you chose into the third position (the &#8220;hundreds place&#8221;).</p>
<p>There are two caveats here.  First, it will only work (as written) if your age is a two-digit number.  So, if you&#8217;re an old woman (100+) who likes chocolate, you&#8217;re out of luck.  Second, the claim that this is the only year it will work is a little silly.  It will only work AS WRITTEN in 2009, but it&#8217;s easy to see how we could change the rules so it works in future years.  You get some parameters (the numbers we multiplied by and added) to play with.  In 2010, use 1760/1759&#8230;in 2011, use 1761/1760&#8230;etc.  You could also manipulate the values to accommodate older folks, but the number of centenarians reading this sort of email is likely quite small.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re all welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenny</title>
		<link>http://www.superficialgallery.com/chocolate-calculator-it-works/3859#comment-2686</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.superficialgallery.com/?p=3859#comment-2686</guid>
		<description>It said that I was two.  I checked a few times and I did it right.  I haven&#039;t been two in a really long time.  This is nothing but a ploy by the candy people to keep me fat.  I have always been grateful to the candy people for their assistance with keeping my shape on the rounder side, but I have never really needed their help so I&#039;M NOT BUYIN&#039;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It said that I was two.  I checked a few times and I did it right.  I haven&#8217;t been two in a really long time.  This is nothing but a ploy by the candy people to keep me fat.  I have always been grateful to the candy people for their assistance with keeping my shape on the rounder side, but I have never really needed their help so I&#8217;M NOT BUYIN&#8217;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maitland</title>
		<link>http://www.superficialgallery.com/chocolate-calculator-it-works/3859#comment-2682</link>
		<dc:creator>Maitland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.superficialgallery.com/?p=3859#comment-2682</guid>
		<description>who the hell gives a shit about math. it&#039;s not math, it is fuckin&#039; MAGIC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who the hell gives a shit about math. it&#8217;s not math, it is fuckin&#8217; MAGIC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vange</title>
		<link>http://www.superficialgallery.com/chocolate-calculator-it-works/3859#comment-2673</link>
		<dc:creator>vange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 05:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.superficialgallery.com/?p=3859#comment-2673</guid>
		<description>Good pizza, though?  Now THAT&#039;S magic!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good pizza, though?  Now THAT&#8217;S magic!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vange</title>
		<link>http://www.superficialgallery.com/chocolate-calculator-it-works/3859#comment-2672</link>
		<dc:creator>vange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 05:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.superficialgallery.com/?p=3859#comment-2672</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s just math, guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s just math, guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joelle</title>
		<link>http://www.superficialgallery.com/chocolate-calculator-it-works/3859#comment-2670</link>
		<dc:creator>Joelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 23:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.superficialgallery.com/?p=3859#comment-2670</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m craving pizza.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m craving pizza.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: solomonsydelle</title>
		<link>http://www.superficialgallery.com/chocolate-calculator-it-works/3859#comment-2669</link>
		<dc:creator>solomonsydelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 20:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.superficialgallery.com/?p=3859#comment-2669</guid>
		<description>wow, it does work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, it does work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vettech</title>
		<link>http://www.superficialgallery.com/chocolate-calculator-it-works/3859#comment-2668</link>
		<dc:creator>vettech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 20:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.superficialgallery.com/?p=3859#comment-2668</guid>
		<description>It worked...but can someone explain how it worked?  Magic!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It worked&#8230;but can someone explain how it worked?  Magic!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vettech</title>
		<link>http://www.superficialgallery.com/chocolate-calculator-it-works/3859#comment-2667</link>
		<dc:creator>vettech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 20:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.superficialgallery.com/?p=3859#comment-2667</guid>
		<description>Cool post, I guess... but now I just wish I had saved that half of a chocolate bunny I tossed out after Easter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool post, I guess&#8230; but now I just wish I had saved that half of a chocolate bunny I tossed out after Easter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/20 queries in 0.042 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 576/607 objects using memcached

Served from: www.superficialgallery.com @ 2012-02-12 03:44:51 -->
