Comments on: Randy Johnson has won Number 300 http://www.superficialgallery.com/randy-johnson-has-won-number-300/4560#utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=randy-johnson-has-won-number-300 Creepily Gathering Content Since 2005 Sun, 14 Mar 2010 07:09:06 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Maitland http://www.superficialgallery.com/randy-johnson-has-won-number-300/4560/comment-page-1#comment-3402 Maitland Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:59:53 +0000 http://www.superficialgallery.com/?p=4560#comment-3402 I don't think his name has been mentioned for steroids. There was a period of his career where he went from lesser player to dominant, but that was mainly due to pitching mechanics. He pitched wild and all over the place, but still hard. Someone straightened up his delivery and he could locate better. So, don't think steroids is an issue here. I don’t think his name has been mentioned for steroids. There was a period of his career where he went from lesser player to dominant, but that was mainly due to pitching mechanics.

He pitched wild and all over the place, but still hard. Someone straightened up his delivery and he could locate better. So, don’t think steroids is an issue here.

]]> By: vettech http://www.superficialgallery.com/randy-johnson-has-won-number-300/4560/comment-page-1#comment-3397 vettech Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:44:39 +0000 http://www.superficialgallery.com/?p=4560#comment-3397 I mean... it's an awesome accomplishment either way, but I'm curious about the "asterisk" factor. I mean… it’s an awesome accomplishment either way, but I’m curious about the “asterisk” factor.

]]> By: vettech http://www.superficialgallery.com/randy-johnson-has-won-number-300/4560/comment-page-1#comment-3396 vettech Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:43:27 +0000 http://www.superficialgallery.com/?p=4560#comment-3396 Is he one of the "clean" ones or is he on steroids? Is he one of the “clean” ones or is he on steroids?

]]> By: midge http://www.superficialgallery.com/randy-johnson-has-won-number-300/4560/comment-page-1#comment-3390 midge Fri, 05 Jun 2009 10:02:49 +0000 http://www.superficialgallery.com/?p=4560#comment-3390 no comment no comment

]]>